4.6 Review

Non-canonical functions of RGS proteins

Journal

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages 1274-1281

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.03.016

Keywords

Regulator of G protein signalling; Heterotrimeric G protein; G protein-coupled receptor; Cell migration; Gene transcription; Nucleus

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL071755, R01 GM85058, T32 HD 07009, T32 HL 07605]
  2. American Heart Association [10PRE2630163, 0825868G]
  3. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [T32HD007009] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [T32HL007605, R01HL071755] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM085058] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Regulators of G protein signalling (RCS) proteins are united into a family by the presence of the RGS domain which serves as a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for various Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins. Through this mechanism. RCS proteins regulate signalling of numerous G protein-coupled receptors. In addition to the RCS domains, RCS proteins contain diverse regions of various lengths that regulate intracellular localization. GAP activity or receptor selectivity of RCS proteins, often through interaction with other partners. However, it is becoming increasingly appreciated that through these non-RCS regions. RCS proteins can serve non-canonical functions distinct from inactivation of Galpha subunits. This review summarizes the data implicating RGS proteins in the (i) regulation of G protein signalling by non-canonical mechanisms, (ii) regulation of non-G protein signalling, (iii) signal transduction from receptors not coupled to G proteins, (iv) activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases, and (v) non-canonical functions in the nucleus. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available