4.7 Article

Splanchnic and mammary nitrogen metabolism by dairy cows fed dry-rolled or steam-flaked sorghum grain

Journal

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
Volume 85, Issue 1, Pages 148-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74063-0

Keywords

nitrogen metabolism; dairy cows; flaked sorghum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives were to determine net release or uptake of alpha-amino N, ammonia N, and urea N across portaldrained viscera, liver, splanchnic, and mammary tissues of lactating Holstein cows (n = 8, 86 +/- 8 d in milk) fed alfalfa hay-based total mixed rations containing 40% dry-rolled or steam-flaked sorghum grain. The total mixed rations were offered at 12-h intervals in a crossover design. Blood samples were obtained from indwelling catheters in the portal, hepatic, and mammary veins and mesenteric or costoabdominal arteries, every 2 h for each cow and diet. Steam-flaking increased in vitro rate of starch hydrolysis compared with dry-rolled sorghum (66 vs. 25%). Diet did not alter dry matter intake (18.2 +/- 0.3 kg). Daily milk yield (27.6 +/- 0.8 kg), efficiency of production, and most milk components did not differ between diets, but fat yield was reduced (0.86 vs. 0.91 kg/d) by steam-flaked sorghum, and lactose concentration was increased (4.99 vs. 4.82%). Blood flows in portal and hepatic veins did not differ between diets. Steam-flaking tended to increase urea N cycling to the gut (162 vs. 95 g/d) compared with dry-rolling of sorghum, whereas net absorption of ammonia N and alpha-amino N across portal-drained viscera were decreased. Net mammary uptake of alpha-amino N increased more than 20% (83 vs. 67 g/d), resulting in a higher mammary extraction ratio (15 vs. 11%) for steam-flaked versus dry-rolled sorghum. Flaking of sorghum improved the efficiency of postabsorptive N metabolism by increasing urea N cycled to the gut and alpha-amino N uptake by the mammary gland.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available