4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Determination of laminar flame speeds using digital particle image velocimetry: Binary fuel blends of ethylene, n-butane, and toluene

Journal

PROCEEDINGS OF THE COMBUSTION INSTITUTE
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 1427-1434

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S1540-7489(02)80175-4

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The atmospheric laminar flame speeds of mixtures of air with ethylene, n-butane, toluene, ethylene-n-butane, ethylene-toluene, and n-butane-toluene were experimentally and computationally investigated over an extended range of equivalence ratios. Binary fuel blends with 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1 molar ratios were examined. Experimentally, the laminar flame speeds were determined using digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV). Since the use of DPIV enables the mapping of the two-dimensional flow field ahead of the flame, the reference speed based on the minimum axial velocity point as well as the imposed strain rate can be identified simultaneously. The latter can now be unambiguously determined by the radial velocity gradient at the minimum velocity point. By systematically varying the imposed strain rate, the corresponding laminar flame speed was obtained through nonlinear extrapolation to zero strain rate. The associated experimental accuracy of the DPIV measurements was also assessed and discussed. Computationally, the laminar flame speeds were simulated for all single-component fuel/air and binary fuel blend/air mixtures with a detailed kinetic model. Comparison of experimental and computed flame speeds shows generally good agreement. A semiempirical mixing rule was developed. The mixing rule, which requires only the knowledge of the flame speeds and flame temperatures of the individual fuel constituents, is shown to provide accurate estimates for the laminar flame speeds of binary fuel blends under the conditions tested.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available