4.5 Article

Nuclear factor-kappa B activation in the nasal polyp epithelium: Relationship to local cytokine gene expression

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages 53-58

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200201000-00010

Keywords

nasal polyps; epithelial cells; NF-kappa B; IL-8; IL-16; eotaxin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: A panel of cytokines has been found to be important for cosinophil accumulation and activation in nasal polyps. The aims of this study were to ascertain whether the activation of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappaB) occurred in the polyp epithelium, and to examine the relationship between the degree of activation and local cytokine gene expression. Study Design/Methods: Nasal polyp specimens were obtained from 26 untreated patients. The proportion of nuclear translocation of the NF-kappaB p50 subunit in the polyp epithelium was quantitatively analyzed by a combination of fluorescent immunohistochemistry and a laser scanning confocal microscope image system. The levels of GM-CSF, IL-5, IL-8, IL-16, and eotaxin mRNA expression in the same specimens were measured using reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Results: Both cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of the p50 subunit was observed mainly in the epithelial layer in all specimens. The percentages of epithelial cells with nuclear translocation ranged from 4.5% to 40.5% (median, 18%). Significant correlations were observed between the degree of epithelial NF-kappaB activation and the levels of IL-8, IL-16, and eotaxin mRNA expression (r = 0.468, 0.47, and 0.739, respectively). Conclusion: The activation of NF-kappaB in the nasal polyp epithelium is responsible for the recruitment of inflammatory cells, particularly eosinophils, through the initiation of the transcriptional pathway of the related cytokines. The increased NF-kappaB activity in the polyp epithelium may reflect hypersensitivity to unknown stimuli.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available