4.6 Article

CGA gene (coding for the alpha subunit of glycoprotein hormones) overexpression in ER alpha-positive prostate tumors

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages 335-341

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0302-2838(02)00020-9

Keywords

prostate cancer; CGA; ER alpha; real-time RT-PCR quantification

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The precise role of estrogen. estrogen receptor (ER) and ER-responsive genes in prostate carcinogenesis is unclear. Paradoxically, estrogens and antiestrogens are used in the treatment of advanced metastatic prostate cancers. Recently, we identified CGA gene coding for the alpha subunit of glycoprotein hormones as a new ERalpha-responsive gene in human breast cancer cells. The aim of this study was to explore the role of CGA in the second major hormone-related cancer, i.e. prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: We quantified CGA mRNA in nine cases of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 23 sporadic prostate tumors (TP) by using a real-time quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. Results: CGA overexpression (>10 S.D. above the mean in normal prostate tissues (NP)) was observed in 39% of the TP (ranging from 4.4 to 174.5 times the level in NP) and in none of the BPH samples. CGA overexpression was not accompanied by overexpression of the CGB, LHB, TSHB or FSHB genes to produce ectopic glycoprotein hormones. CGA gene overexpression correlated with ER), normal expression (P = 0.016), but not with ERbeta or androgen receptor (AR) expression status. Conclusion: These results point to CGA gene as a member of a novel dysregulated pathway in prostate cancer. CGA should therefore be considered for investigation as possible novel molecular marker in clinical applications and as possible new potential therapeutic target. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available