4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Short-term safety of celocentesis for the mother and the fetus

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 243-245

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00646.x

Keywords

celocentesis; early pregnancy; prenatal diagnosis; safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective Celocentesis offers the potential for prenatal diagnosis from as early as 6 weeks of gestation. The aim of this study was to examine the short-term safety of celocentesis. Methods Eligible for the study were pregnant women with single live fetuses at 6-10 weeks of gestation, requesting pregnancy termination for social indications. At presentation, the Patients were asked if they were willing to undergo celocentesis and in those women who agreed the procedure was performed at the time of the initial scan. A second scan was carried out just before termination to measure fetal crown-rump length and heart rate. Results Four hundred and forty-seven women requested termination of pregnancy and 108 of these agreed to have celocentesis. There were no significant differences between the groups in maternal age, prevalence of primigravidas, cigarette smokers, existence of uterine fibroids, the median fetal crown-rump length or the interval between the initial scan (or celocentesis) at presentation and the pregnancy termination. At the time of termination, ultrasound examination demonstrated fetal death in five (4.7%) of the celocentesis group and nine (2.7%) of the controls (odds ratio, 1.804; 95% confidence interval, 0.5912-5.504). In all other cases, there was normal fetal growth and there were no significant differences between the groups in fetal crown-rump length. Conclusions The procedure related fetal loss associated with celocentesis may be approximately 2%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available