Journal
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages 317-321Publisher
W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.29620
Keywords
epicondylitis; lateral humeral; muscles; pain; pain thresholds; rehabilitation
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objectives: To investigate pain, disability, and muscle function of the arm in medial epicondylitis and to compare the results with those in chronic lateral epicondylitis. Design: Cross-sectional, case-control study. Setting: University hospital clinic admitting chronic hand patients. Participants: Twenty-five patients with chronic unilateral medial epicondylitis, and 25 age- and gender-matched patients with chronic unilateral lateral epicondylitis. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Pain drawing (PD) and a pain questionnaire with 7 items of pain and disability on visual analog scale (VAS). Dolorimeter measurements of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) on 3 defined cubital points. The isometric grip strength and isokinetic performance of wrist and forearm at a radial velocity of 90degrees/s. Results: Patients with medial epicondylitis had significantly less pain under strain (6.7 vs 7.9cm on VAS, P = .03) and a smaller PD (1.9 vs. 2.5, P = .02) than patients with lateral epicondylitis. The PPTs of medial epicondyles were 54% (P = .0000) lower in medial epicondylitis. In lateral epicondylitis, all 3 cubital points showed significant decreases in PPTs. The isometric grip strength (mean and maximal) decreased by 6.2% and 3.6%, compared with the patients' healthy arms (P = .03, .16) and by 11.4% and 8.9% (P = .008, .02), respectively, compared with the expected value; in lateral epicondylitis, the grip strength decreased by 11.8% and 10.6% (P =.005, .01) and by 15% and 14% (P = .003, .007), respectively, when compared with the expected grip strength. Peak torque and produced work in wrist flexion were significantly reduced by 13% and 17% (P =.005, .0001), respectively, in both diseases. In lateral epicondylitis, supination and pronation were also reduced by 10% and 15% (P = .03). Conclusions: In chronic medial epicondylitis, muscle function and pain measures showed a lesser impaired function of the arm than in chronic lateral epicondylitis. The results may be useful in rehabilitation and treatment of epicondylitis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available