4.5 Article

High b-value q-space analyzed diffusion-weighted MRI: Application to multiple sclerosis

Journal

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages 115-126

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10040

Keywords

high b-value DWI; diffusion MRI; white matter; multiple sclerosis (MS); q-space diffusion MRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) which affects nearly one million people worldwide, leading to a progressive decline of motor and sensory functions, and permanent disability. High b-value diffusion-weighted MR images (b of up to 14000 s/mm(2)) were acquired from the brains of controls and MS patients. These diffusion MR images, in which signal decay is not monoexponential, were analyzed using the q-space approach that emphasizes the diffusion characteristics of the slow-diffusing component. From this analysis, displacement and probability maps were constructed. The computed q-space analyzed MR images that were compared with conventional T-1, T-2 (fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) images were found to be sensitive to the pathophysiological state of white matter. The indices used to construct this q-space analyzed MR maps, provided a pronounced differentiation between normal tissue and tissues classified as MS plaques by the FLAIR images. More importantly, a pronounced differentiation was also observed between tissues classified by the FLAIR MR images as normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) in the MS brains, which are known to be abnormal, and the respective control tissues. The potential diagnostic capacity of high b-value diffusion q-space analyzed MR images is discussed, and experimental data that explains the consequences of using the q-space approach once the short pulse gradient approximation is violated are presented. Magn Reson Med 47:115-126, 2002. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available