4.4 Article

Expression of cyclin kinase inhibitor p2l/WAF1 protein in pituitary adenomas: Correlations with endocrine activity, but not cell proliferation

Journal

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume 144, Issue 5, Pages 481-488

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s007010200069

Keywords

pituitary adenoma; p2l/WAF1; hormone activity; differentiation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

p21/WAF1 blocks cell cycle progression through inhibition of cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks) complexes and, simultaneously, has been associated with cell cycle exit and the process of differentiation. In this series, the expression of p21/WAF1 was assessed immunohistochemically in 47 cases of pituitary adenomas in relation to endocrine activity and cell proliferation. To evaluate cell proliferation, a monoclonal antibody, MIB-1, against Ki-67 antigen was used in all of the available cases. The study revealed positive p21/WAF1 staining in 24 cases of 26 functioning parenchymas, whereas 14 cases of 21 non-functioning parenchymas stained negative. The MIB-1 index ranged from less than 1% to 5.1%, (mean: less than 1.7%) in functioning adenomas, and from less than 1% to 3.6% (mean: less than 1.6%) in non-functioning adenomas. Regardless of endocrine activity, p21/WAF1 positivity did not correlate with the MIB-1 index. Double staining techniques revealed the co-expression of p21/WAF1/GH or p21/WAF1/PRL in functioning adenomas. In 22 cases of p21/WAF1-positive functioning adenomas, p21/WAF1 immunoreactivity was seen in the cytoplasma as well as nuclei. These results indicate that in pituitary adenomas, p21/WAF1 expression is associated with endocrine activity, but not with cell proliferation. Taken together with recent findings demonstrating that cytoplasmic p21/WAF1 acts as an inhibitor of apoptosis, it is possible that pituitary adenomas expressing cytoplasmic p21/WAF1 have resistance against DNA-damaging agents such as ionizing radiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available