4.5 Article

Buprenorphine and midazolam act in combination to depress respiration in rats

Journal

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Volume 65, Issue 1, Pages 107-114

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/65.1.107

Keywords

buprenorphine; midazolam; acute toxicity; respiratory depression; safety; rats; LD50; arterial blood gas; opioids; heroin substitution; drug abuse

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High dose buprenorphine is used as substitution treatment in human heroin addiction. Deaths have been reported in addicts using buprenorphine, frequently in association with benzodiazepines. In the current study, we observed the effects of buprenorphine and midazolam alone and in combination on arterial blood gases. Four groups of 10 male Sprague-Dawley rats received a parenteral injection of aqueous solvent, buprenorphine (30 mg/kg, iv), midazolam (160 mg/kg ip), or buprenorphine (30 mg/kg, iv) plus midazolam (160 mg/kg, ip). Serial blood gases were obtained over 3 hours. There was a mild but significant effect of buprenorphine alone in comparison with the aqueous solvent on PaCO2 at 60 min (6.24 vs. 5.65 kPa, p<0.01). There was also a mild but significant effect of midazolam alone in comparison with aqueous solvent on arterial pH at 90 min (7.33 vs. 7.41, p<0.001) and PaCO2 at 60 min (6.52 vs. 5.65 kPa, p<0.01). The combination of midazolam and buprenorphine produces a rapid, profound, and prolonged respiratory depression, as demonstrated by an increase in PaCO2 at 7.65&PLUSMN;0.12 kPa at 20 min and a decrease in arterial pH at 7.25&PLUSMN;0.02 at 20min, with appearance of delayed hypoxia with a decrease in PaO2 at 8.74&PLUSMN;0.20 kPa at 120 min. These data show that high doses of midazolam and buprenorphine alone have limited effects on arterial blood gases in rats while midazolam. and buprenorphine appear to act in an additive or synergistic fashion to depress ventilation in rats.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available