4.2 Article

Prolactin Induces MAPK Signaling in Neural Progenitors without Alleviating Glucocorticoid-Induced Inhibition of in vitro Neurogenesis

Journal

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 24, Issue 5-6, Pages 397-406

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000257432

Keywords

Neural stem cells; Neural progenitors; Neuropeptides; Stress; Cell proliferation; Astroglia

Funding

  1. Bayerische Forschungsstiftung, Munich, Germany
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. Bavarian State Ministry of Sciences, Research and the Arts
  4. state of Salzburg
  5. Germany Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [0312134, 01GG0706, 01GN0505]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently demonstrated that prolactin (PRL) prevents chronic stress-induced inhibition of adult hippocampal neurogenesis. It remained unsettled, however, whether PRL is acting directly on neural stem and progenitors cells (NPCs) or if neurogenesis is affected by an indirect mechanism, for example through the extensively described effects of PRL on the HPA axis. To address this point, we used neurosphere cultures derived from the adult rat hippocampus as an in vitro model for NPCs. Dexamethasone (DEX) was applied to stress the NPCs, and proliferation, survival and differentiation of cells were examined. DEX markedly inhibited proliferation of NPCs and cells entered the G 0 phase of cell cycle. Moreover, DEX reduced NPC survival and repressed astroglial differentiation, which is normally induced by serum or bone morphogenetic protein application. Even though we could demonstrate that NPCs express the PRL receptor and ERK1/2 signaling is induced by PRL, we did not observe any effect of PRL on NPCs proliferation, differentiation or survival, neither in the presence nor during absence of DEX. In summary, our results indicate that PRL action on NPCs and neurogenesis in vivo occurs via an indirect mechanism. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available