4.2 Article

Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Amitriptyline in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Journal

CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 24, Issue 1-2, Pages 65-72

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000227814

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis; Amitriptyline; P. aeruginosa; Ceramide; CFTR

Funding

  1. DFG [Gu 335/16-1]
  2. Mukoviszidose e. V., Bonn
  3. German Cystic Fibrosis Association
  4. AKF-program of the University of Tubingen, Tubingen, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amitriptyline, a blocker of acid sphingomyelinase and acid ceramidase, significantly reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa lung infection in cystic fibrosis (CF) mice with concurrent increase of survival. Our aim was to establish whether amitriptyline is safe and effective in the treatment of CF patients. In a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, cross-over pilot study, 4 adult CF patients received 37.5 mg of amitriptyline or placebo twice daily for 14 days. Subsequently in a phase II study 19 adult CF patients were randomly allocated to three treatment groups receiving amitriptyline once daily for 28 days at doses of 25 mg (n=7), 50 mg (n=8), or 75 mg (n=8) or placebo (n=13). The primary outcome was the difference of forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at day 14 between amitriptyline and placebo. Primary endpoint measures improved significantly in three of four patients in the pilot study after amitriptyline treatment vs placebo (relative FEV1: 14.7 +/- 5%; p=0.006) and in the 25 mg treatment group of the phase II study (relative FEV1: 4.0 +/- 7%; p=0.048). Amitriptyline was well tolerated in both studies and 96% of the patients completed the studies. Amitriptyline as a novel therapeutic option in patients with CF is safe and seems to be efficacious. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available