4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Calibration of lichen transplants considering faint memory effects

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 87-95

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(02)00131-8

Keywords

biomonitoring; trace elements; deposition; nuclear analytical techniques

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomonitoring, among other purposes, can be used as a tool to study the dispersion of trace elements through the atmosphere and back to the earth's surface again. In this sense it has been used for more than 20 years now. Yet, the calibration of biomonitors elemental contents against other atmospheric element dispersion variables like deposition or airborne concentration is still an open subject. The knowledge of a calibration nevertheless represents a qualitative improvement upon the use of biomonitors. Biomonitors elemental contents are usually assumed to depend in a linear way on the average values of atmospheric element dispersion variables, thus a linear regression is assumed to provide a good calibration. In this work: the element dispersion variables like deposition or airborne concentration will be referred in general as availability variables due to reasons that will be clarified; an uptake experiment using transplants of lichen Parmelia sulcata carried out in Portugal during a 2-year period (1994/1996) is described; and new concepts and calibration methods are presented. Lichen and aerosol samples were analysed by nuclear analytical techniques PIXE and INAA, and total deposition dry residue samples were analysed by ICP-MS. A database of roughly 70,000 values was thus created and biomonitor calibration carried out considering that biomonitors are not mechanical instruments but that they rather describe their exposure with a non-perfect memory. Data shows that surveying lichens four times within I year, with a period of 3 months in between sampling campaigns, allows the recovery of availability mean, maxima and standard deviation for many elements. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available