4.3 Article

Histopathological-molecular genetic correlations in referral pathologist-diagnosed low-grade oligodendroglioma

Journal

Publisher

AMER ASSN NEUROPATHOLOGISTS INC
DOI: 10.1093/jnen/61.1.58

Keywords

astrocytoma; chromosome 1p; chromosome 19q; GFAP; histopathology; oligodendroglioma

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA57683] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA057683] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Allelic loss of chromosome 1p predicts increased chemosensitivity and better survival in oligodendroglial tumours. Clinical testing for 1p loss in oligodendroglial tumors at our hospital has allowed LIS to Postulate that certain histological appearances are associated with 1p allelic status. Forty-four cases received for genetic testing were diagnosed by referring pathologists as pure low-grade oligodendroglioma. Central neuropathological review, divided the series equally into 22 cases with classical oligodendroglioma histology and 22 with more astrocytic features. Molecular genetic analyses- demonstrated I p loss in 19 of 22 classic oligodendrogliomas (86%) and maintenance of both 1p alleles in 16 of 22 gliomas with astrocytic features (73%). No glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive cell type (gliofibrillary oligodendrocyte, minigemistocyte. cellular processes) was associated with I p allelic status. Fourteen of the 44 cases were treated with chemotherapy at tumor progression: 3 astrocytic gliomas with 1p loss responded to PCV chemotherapy and 2 classic oligodendrogliomas that maintained both 1p alleles included a responder and a non-responder. These results suggest that histological appearance correctly predicts genotype in approximately 80% of low-grade gliomas, but that tumor genotype more closely predicts chemosensitivity, As a result, such objective molecular genetic analyses should be incorporated into patient management into clinical trials of low-grade diffuse gliomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available