4.4 Article

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas

Journal

ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA
Volume 144, Issue 12, Pages 1249-1254

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-002-0974-x

Keywords

acoustic neuroma; radiotherapy; radiosurgery; fractionation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. When compared to radiosurgery, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSR) for acoustic neuroma (AN) offers escalation of tumor dose (Gy) and potential sparing of auditory and facial nerve functions. Method. Over the past 6.5 years 287 consecutive patients have received FSR for AN. One hundred fifty patients have follow up greater than I year and comprise this report. Non-invasive, repeat-fixation mask allowed simulation via spiral CT. Differential collimation and beam weighting achieved conformality. Three distinct schedules for total dose and fractionation were used. For AN < 3.0 cm diameter (mean volume 1.5 +/- 0.2 cc), greater than or equal to 3.0 and less than or equal to 3.9 cm (mean volume 8.7 +/- 1.0 cc) and greater than or equal to 4.0 cm (mean volume 28.3 cc (one case) doses of 5 Gy given in 5 consecutive daily fractions (25 Gy total) (131 patient), 10 fractions of 3 Gy (30 Gy total) (18 pts), or 20 fractions of 2 Gy (I patient) were given. All treatments were prescribed to the 80% isodose and given via the dedicated 10 MeV accelerator. Findings. The percentage decreases in tumor size were 14 +/- I (range: 0-100), 15 +/- 3 (range 0-38) and 8 for the 25, 30 and 40 Gy regimens, respectively. No patient had growth of AN or developed facial weakness. Two patients developed transient decrease in facial sensation. Rates of hearing preservation were similar for both the larger and smaller tumors. Interpretation. Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy may preserve normal function and control both small and large acoustic neuromas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available