4.5 Article

Natural killer cells are recruited during pulmonary tuberculosis and their ex vivo responses to mycobacteria vary between healthy human donors in association with KIR haplotype

Journal

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages 1734-1744

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01834.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MRC [U117581288]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, USA
  3. Korean Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_U117581288] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. MRC [MC_U117581288] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Humans vary widely in their susceptibility to tuberculosis. While only a minority will progress to disease, the majority of healthy individuals exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis mount an immune response that can clear or contain the infection in a quiescent form. Using immunofluorescence on human clinical samples, we identified natural killer (NK) cells infiltrating granulomatous pulmonary lesions during active disease. In order to compare the NK cell ability to react to free mycobacteria in the context of tuberculosis infection and Mycobacterium bovis BCG vaccination, NK cells were isolated from the peripheral blood of anonymous healthy human donors, and stimulated with M.?tuberculosis H37Rv or M.?bovis BCG. Extracellular M.?tuberculosis and M.?bovis BCG could equally trigger the release of IFN? and TNFa from NK cells in the presence of IL-2. However, we found that this response varied 1000-fold between individuals (n?=?52), with differences in KIR haplotype providing a significant criterion to distinguish between low and high responders. Our findings suggest that variations at the KIR locus and therefore of the NK cell repertoire may affect cytokine production in response to mycobacteria and we propose that this innate variability couldsustain different levels of susceptibility to M.?tuberculosis infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available