4.5 Article

Soluble CD163 promotes recognition, phagocytosis and killing of Staphylococcus aureus via binding of specific fibronectin peptides

Journal

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages 914-936

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01766.x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German research association [SFB 492/B9]
  2. Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research of the University of Munster [DFG RO 1190/9-1]
  3. FP7 Marie Curie Fellowship
  4. RSC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CD163 is a multi-ligand scavenger receptor exclusively expressed by monocytes and macrophages, which is released after their activation during sepsis (sCD163). The biological relevance of sCD163, however, is not yet clear. We now demonstrate that sCD163 exhibits direct antimicrobial effects by recognizing a specific subfragment (6F11F22F27F1) of fibronectin (FN) bound to staphylococcal surface molecules. Moreover, contact with staphylococci promotes sCD163-shedding from monocyte surface via induction of metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17. sCD163 subsequently binds to Staphylococcus aureus via FN peptides and strongly amplifies phagocytosis as well as killing by monocytes and to a lesser extend by neutrophils. This mechanism exhibits additional paracrine effects because staphylococci additionally opsonized by sCD163 induce higher activation and more efficient killing activity of non-professional phagocytes like endothelial cells. Targeting pathogen-bound FN by sCD163 would be a very sophisticated strategy to attack S. aureus as any attempt of the pathogen to avoid this defence mechanism will automatically bring about loss of adherence to the host protein FN, which is a pivotal patho-mechanism of highly invasive staphylococcal strains. Thus, we report a novel function for sCD163 that is of particular importance for immune defence of the host against S. aureus infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available