4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

SIMS analysis of volatiles in silicate glasses 1. Calibration, matrix effects and comparisons with FTIR

Journal

CHEMICAL GEOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue 1-4, Pages 99-114

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-2541(01)00375-8

Keywords

SIMS; ion probe; volatiles; microbeam; water; isotopes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper describes microanalysis techniques using secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to measure the abundances and isotopic compositions of hydrogen, carbon, fluorine, sulfur and chlorine in volcanic glasses. SIMS measurement of total H2O and total CO2 abundances compare very well with measurements on the same glasses using vibrational spectroscopy techniques (FTIR). A typical 10-min SIMS measurement for volatile abundances is made on a singly polished specimen, sputtering a crater 15-30 mum in diameter and 2-3 mum deep, utilizing 1-5 x 10(-9) g of sample material. Detection limits are routinely < 30 ppm H2O < 3 ppm CO2, and < 1 ppm F, S and Cl. Measurements of deltaD, delta(13)C and delta(34)S in volcanic glasses are currently reproducible and accurate to 2-5 parts per thousand, depending on the concentration of the element. Because of their spatial selectivity, the SIMS methods allow resolution of magmatic volatile signatures from those carried by secondary phases, which can sometimes plague traditional vacuum extraction methods that require large amounts of sample (tens to hundreds of milligrams). Ease of sample preparation, rapid analysis and high sensitivity allow SIMS to be applied to volatile analysis of small samples such as melt inclusions, in which large numbers of individual analyses are often required in order to obtain a representative sample population. Combined abundance and isotopic composition data for volatile elements provide coupled constraints on processes relevant to magma genesis and evolution, including degassing, magma contamination, mixing, and source variability. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available