3.8 Article

Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children

Journal

OBESITY RESEARCH
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages 150-157

Publisher

NORTH AMER ASSOC STUDY OBESITY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2002.24

Keywords

motion sensors; accelerometers; Computer Science and Applications Actigraph; Mini-Mitter Actiwatch

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study was designed to validate accelerometer-based activity monitors against energy expenditure (EE) in children: to compare monitor placement sites to field-test the monitors: and to establish sedentary. light, moderate, and vigorous threshold counts. Research Methods and Procedures: Computer Science and Applications Actigraph (CSA) and Mini-Mitter Actiwatch (MM) monitors. on the hip or lower leg, were validated and calibrated against 6-hour EE measurements by room respiration calorimetry, activity by microwave detector, and heart rate by telemetry in 26 children, 6 to 16 years old. During the 6 hours, the children performed structured activities, including resting metabolic rate (RMR), Nintendo, arts and crafts. aerobic warm-up, Tae Bo, treadmill walking and running. and games. Activity energy expenditure (AEE) computed as EE - RMR was regressed against counts to derive threshold counts. Results: The mean correlations between EE or AEE and counts were slightly higher for MM-hip (r = 0.78 +/- 0.06) and MM-leg (r = 0.80 +/- 0.05) than CSA-hip (r = 0.66 +/- 0.08) and CSA-leg (r = 0.73 +/- 0.07). CSA and MM performed similarly on the hip (inter-instrument r = 0.88) and on the lower leg (inter-instrument r = 0.89). Threshold counts for the CSA-hip were <800, <3200, <8200, and greater than or equal to8200 for sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous categories, respectively. For the MM-hip. the threshold counts were <100, <900, <2200, and greater than or equal to2200, respectively. Discussion: The validation of the CSA and MM monitors against AEE and their calibration for sedentary, light, moderate, and vigorous thresholds certify these monitors as valid, useful devices for the assessment of physical activity in children.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available