4.5 Article

Prognostic value of energy metabolism in patients with viral liver cirrhosis

Journal

NUTRITION
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 229-234

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0899-9007(01)00754-7

Keywords

viral liver cirrhosis; energy metabolism; indirect calorimetry; resting energy expenditure; non-protein respiratory quotient; survival

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of energy malnutrition on survival in patients with non-alcoholic viral liver cirrhosis has not been well defined. We characterized energy metabolism at study entrance and prospectively analyzed its effect on subsequent survival in cirrhotics. One hundred nine consecutive patients with viral liver cirrhosis and 22 healthy control subjects participated in the study. By indirect calorimetry after overnight bedrest and fasting, resting energy expenditure (REE) was measured and non-protein respiratory quotient (npRQ) was calculated. Survival of cirrhotics were followed for up to 8 y. Survival rate was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. REE at entrance was significantly higher than the predicted basal metabolic rate (BMR) in cirrhotics (P < 0.001). NpRQ was significantly lower in cirrhotics than in controls (P < 0.001). Survival rate was significantly lower in patients with low npRQ ( < 0.85) than in patients with scores above 0.85 (P < 0.01) and was significantly higher in normal metabolic patients (0.9 < REE/BMR < 1.1) than in hypometabolic (REE/BMR < 0.9) or hypermetabolic (1.1 < REE/BMR) patients (P < 0.05). The proportional hazards model showed that npRQ (relative risk = 0.0003, 95% confidence interval = 0.0000-0.0970), REE/BMR (0.0199, 0.0007-0.5652), prothrombin time, and ammonia were independent significant factors determining survival. Thus evaluation of energy metabolism can be used to predict survival in patients with viral liver cirrhosis. (C) Elsevier Science Inc. 2002.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available