4.3 Article

Expression of spermadhesin genes in porcine male and female reproductive tracts

Journal

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 32-41

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.1128

Keywords

spermadhesins; CUB domain; gene expression; cDNA sequences; seminal plasma; epididymis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spermadhesins, secretory proteins of the male genital tract, constitute the bulk of seminal plasma proteins in pig. The nucleotide sequences of spermadhesins AWN, AQN-1, and AQN-3 from the cDNAs, derived from seminal vesicles, were determined. The coding sequences of spermadhesins revealed an overall sequence similarity of 40% at nucleotide level. Expression of spermadhesins (AWN, AQN-1, AQN-3, PSP-I, and PSP-II) in porcine male and female reproductive tracts were studied by means of RT-PCR and immunological approaches. All spermadhesins are transcribed and translated in seminal vesicles and prostate. In caudal epididymis mRNA transcripts of all spermadhesins have been detected by RT-PCR. PSP-I showed additional signals in caput epididymis and rete testis. Translation can be detected only for AWN in tissue extracts by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. Remarkably, AWN is the only spermadhesin that is also expressed in the uterus, the uterotubal junction, and the oviduct of the female genital tract as shown by RT-PCR, cDNA-sequencing, and immunological analysis. In sows at estrus and interestrus, in gilts and gilts 12 hr after insemination no obvious differences were noticed in the pattern of AWN-immunoreactivity in epithelial cells either of the uterotubal junction, isthmus, or ampulla. While strong staining was observed in the superficial uterine glands and in the glands of the uterotubal junction during estrus, in diestrus this declined distinctly. The role of spermadhesins in relation to their expression is discussed. Mot, Reprod. Dev. 61: 32-41, 2002, (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available