4.5 Article

Low-dose oral naloxone reverses opioid-induced constipation and analgesia

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 48-53

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0885-3924(01)00369-4

Keywords

oral naloxone; constipation; opioids; cancer pain; nonmalignant pain

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [5K23 CA 86451] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K23CA086451] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The most common side effect of opioid therapy is constipation. It is often difficult to treat and is believed to be primarily a peripheral effect. Single large doses of oral naloxone have been shown to be efficacious in reversing opioid-induced constipation. However, they often cause the unwanted side effect of analgesia reversal. This study evaluated the effects on constipation and analgesia of low doses of oral naloxone given three times daily. Patients taking stable doses of opioids with complaints of constipation were recruited for this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Patients were given 4 mg or 2 mg of oral naloxone, or placebo, three times daily. Stool frequency and symptoms related to constipation were recorded daily. Patients also recorded the daily amount of analgesics required to maintain pain control. Nine patients were recruited for the study. All the patients who received oral naloxone had some improvement in their bowel frequency. Three of the patients also experienced reversal of analgesia, including one who had complete reversal of analgesia. This study demonstrates that reversal of analgesia still occurred despite dividing the oral naloxone into very low doses relative to the total dose of opioid used. Patients using high doses of opioids appear to be the most vulnerable to the antalgesic effect of oral naloxone. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;23:48-53. (C) U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee 2002.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available