4.5 Article

Motor control and cerebral hemispheric specialization in highly qualified judo wrestlers

Journal

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
Volume 40, Issue 8, Pages 1209-1219

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00227-5

Keywords

right-hemispheric praxis; motor profile; postural and cognitive asymmetry; training; skill; plasticity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the purpose of investigating motor and cognitive lateralization profiles associated with long-term motor training, we investigated differences in hemispheric specialization between proficient judo sportsmen and controls through the assessment of a number of handedness and footedness items including postural preferences as well as dichotic listening and lateralized visual field tests. Our data show that: (1) the different handedness and footedness items did differently relate to each other within the athlete and control groups as revealed by a principle component analysis (PCA); (2) stand side correlated differently to these motor profile factors in athletes and controls; (3) athletes preferred more frequently to perform certain Movements with the left hand than controls, although overall right-handed (4) this was especially true for athletes which proved to be most proficient/skilled: and (5) in a lateralized verbal listening task and a lateralized visual field task athletes repealed enhanced right-hemispheric involvement relative to controls. Our results suggest that during motor and Postural skill acquisitions (long-term judo training) lateral preferences are modified, probably clue to neuroplasticity. Moreover, the present findings support the multidimensional view of handedness by Steenhuis and Bryden [Cortex 25 (1989) 289] and the notion of a right-hemispheric praxis system involved in skilled action routines within peripersonal space [Brain and Cognition 23 (1993) 181], (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available