4.3 Article

Hodgkin's disease in Asians: incidence patterns and risk factors in population-based data

Journal

LEUKEMIA RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 261-269

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0145-2126(01)00126-6

Keywords

Hodgkin's disease; Asians; epidemiology; incidence; SEER

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CN-65107, R29 CA50381] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [050M-8701/8-S1522] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R29CA050381] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hodgkin's disease (HD) has been reported to be rare in Asians. Data sparseness has hindered studies exploring the relative contributions of environment and heredity to HD etiology, and individual risk factors have never been studied in an Asian population. With the most recent, uniformly collected population-based data from the US and Asia, we compared HD incidence rates in Chinese, Japanese, Filipinos, and Asian Indians in the US and in Asia. HD incidence rates were quite low in all Asian subgroups, but approximately double in US Asians as in native Asians. In both, rates were lower for Japanese and Chinese than for Filipinos and Asian Indians. A modest young-adult rate peak occurred for most US Asian groups, but not for any population in Asia. In data from a population-based case control study of HD in San Francisco area women, young-adult Asian cases, like young-adult cases of other racial/ethnic groups, had childhood social environments indicative of less early contact with children. Given environmental and lifestyle differences between the US and Asia, the consistently low rates of HD in Asians suggest genetic resistance to disease development, possibly associated with HLA type. International and inter-ethnic differences, and risk factor patterns in case control data, implicate environmental influences in the etiology of HD. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available