4.7 Review

Generating spinal motor neuron diversity: a long quest for neuronal identity

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 71, Issue 5, Pages 813-829

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-013-1398-x

Keywords

Motor neurons; Spinal cord; Neuronal diversification; Cell differentiation; Embryonic development; Central nervous system

Funding

  1. Fonds speciaux de recherche (FSR) of the UCL
  2. Fund for Scientific Medical Research of the F.R.S.-FNRS [3.4.538.10.F]
  3. Actions de Recherche Concertees (ARC) of the Direction generale de l'Enseignement non obligatoire et de la Recherche scientifique-Direction de la Recherche scientifique-Communaute francaise de Belgique [10/15-026]
  4. Academie universitaire 'Louvain'
  5. Association Belge contre les Maladies neuro-Musculaires asbl (ABMM)
  6. FSR (UCL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding how thousands of different neuronal types are generated in the CNS constitutes a major challenge for developmental neurobiologists and is a prerequisite before considering cell or gene therapies of nervous lesions or pathologies. During embryonic development, spinal motor neurons (MNs) segregate into distinct subpopulations that display specific characteristics and properties including molecular identity, migration pattern, allocation to specific motor columns, and innervation of defined target. Because of the facility to correlate these different characteristics, the diversification of spinal MNs has become the model of choice for studying the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the generation of multiple neuronal populations in the developing CNS. Therefore, how spinal motor neuron subpopulations are produced during development has been extensively studied during the last two decades. In this review article, we will provide a comprehensive overview of the genetic and molecular mechanisms that contribute to the diversification of spinal MNs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available