4.7 Review

Fibronectin in tissue regeneration: timely disassembly of the scaffold is necessary to complete the build

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 70, Issue 22, Pages 4243-4253

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-013-1350-0

Keywords

Fibronectin; Wound healing; Osteoarthritis; Multiple sclerosis; Tissue regeneration

Funding

  1. Netherlands Foundation for the Support of MS Research (Stichting MS Research)
  2. Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research NWO (VIDI and Aspasia)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue injury initiates extracellular matrix molecule expression, including fibronectin production by local cells and fibronectin leakage from plasma. To benefit tissue regeneration, fibronectin promotes opsonization of tissue debris, migration, proliferation, and contraction of cells involved in the healing process, as well as angiogenesis. When regeneration proceeds, the fibronectin matrix is fully degraded. However, in a diseased environment, fibronectin clearance is often disturbed, allowing structural variants to persist and contribute to disease progression and failure of regeneration. Here, we discuss first how fibronectin helps tissue regeneration, with a focus on normal cutaneous wound healing as an example of complete tissue recovery. Then, we continue to argue that, although the fibronectin matrix generated following cartilage and central nervous system white matter (myelin) injury initially benefits regeneration, fibronectin clearance is incomplete in chronic wounds (skin), osteoarthritis (cartilage), and multiple sclerosis (myelin). Fibronectin fragments or aggregates persist, which impair tissue regeneration. The similarities in fibronectin-mediated mechanisms of frustrated regeneration indicate that complete fibronectin clearance is a prerequisite for recovery in any tissue. Also, they provide common targets for developing therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available