4.7 Review

Stress-induced self-cannibalism: on the regulation of autophagy by endoplasmic reticulum stress

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 70, Issue 14, Pages 2425-2441

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-012-1173-4

Keywords

Apoptosis; ATG genes; Autophagy; Cell stress; Chaperone; Unfolded protein response

Funding

  1. Science Foundation Ireland [09/RFP/BIC2371, 09/RFP/BMT2153]
  2. Health Research Board [HRA/2009/59]
  3. Breast Cancer Campaign [2008 NovPhD21, 2010NovPR13]
  4. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [09/RFP/BIC2371, 09/RFP/BMT2153] Funding Source: Science Foundation Ireland (SFI)
  5. Health Research Board (HRB) [HRA-2009-59] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Macroautophagy (autophagy) is a cellular catabolic process which can be described as a self-cannibalism. It serves as an essential protective response during conditions of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress through the bulk removal and degradation of unfolded proteins and damaged organelles; in particular, mitochondria (mitophagy) and ER (reticulophagy). Autophagy is genetically regulated and the autophagic machinery facilitates removal of damaged cell components and proteins; however, if the cell stress is acute or irreversible, cell death ensues. Despite these advances in the field, very little is known about how autophagy is initiated and how the autophagy machinery is transcriptionally regulated in response to ER stress. Some three dozen autophagy genes have been shown to be required for the correct assembly and function of the autophagic machinery; however; very little is known about how these genes are regulated by cellular stress. Here, we will review current knowledge regarding how ER stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) induce autophagy, including description of the different autophagy-related genes which are regulated by the UPR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available