4.7 Review

Specification of neuronal and glial subtypes from human pluripotent stem cells

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 68, Issue 24, Pages 3995-4008

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-011-0770-y

Keywords

Embryonic stem cells; Induced pluripotent stem cells; Neural stem cells; Patterning; Transcriptional regulation; Transplantation; Drug screening

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS045926, NS057778, NS064578]
  2. ALS Association
  3. National MS Society [NMSS TR-3761]
  4. NYSTEM [C024406]
  5. Bleser Family Foundation
  6. Busta Family Foundation
  7. Neuroscience Training Program [T32 GM007507]
  8. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [P30 HD03352]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), including embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), provide a dynamic tool for revealing early embryonic development, modeling pathological processes, and developing therapeutics through drug discovery and potential cell replacement. The first step toward the utilities of human PSCs is directed differentiation to functionally specialized cell/tissue types. Following developmental principles, human ESCs, and lately iPSCs, have been effectively differentiated to region- and/or transmitter-specific neuronal and glial types, including cerebral glutamatergic, striatal gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic, forebrain cholinergic, midbrain dopaminergic, and spinal motor neurons, as well as astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. These studies also reveal unique aspects of human cell biology, including intrinsically programmed developmental course, differential uses of transcription factors for neuroectoderm specification, and distinct responses to extracellular signals in regulating cell fate. Such information will be instrumental in translating biological findings to therapeutic development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available