4.3 Article

Simulated overwintering of Encephalitis viruses in diapausing female Culex tarsalis (Diptera : Culicidae)

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 226-233

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585-39.1.226

Keywords

Culex tarsalis; diapause; arbovirus; western equine encephalornyelitis virus; St. Louis; encephalitis virus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Female Culex tarsalis Coquillett in reproductive diapause were infected per os or by intrathoracic inoculation with western equine encephalomyelitis (WEE) or St. Louis encephalitis (SLE) viruses during fall, maintained over a simulated winter, and then tested for virus infection and transmission in vitro and in vivo after vernal termination. Exposure of F-1 progeny of field-collected females to cool temperatures and short daylength produced females in reproductive diapause that were reluctant to imbibe infections Virus from pledgets soaked with suspensions of virus, blood and sucrose (2.5% by volume). Those infected per os maintained virus at very low or undetectable titers. Some females that originally tested negative for WEE by plaque assay on Vero cell culture tested positive by reverse tran scriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and by Vero cell culture after passage in mosquito cells. Few females became infected orally with SLE, but these infected females developed elevated titers. Females inoculated with SLE retained their infection through winter and then transmitted readily in vitro and in vivo. Feeding on a vertebrate host after diapause termination significantly increased the titer of SLE in previously infected females. These experiments simulated how infections acquired either horizontally or vertically may provide mechanisms for WEE and SLE overwintering. Attempts to detect infected females during winter following a summer with enzootic WEE activity were negative by both RT-PCR and plaque assay.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available