4.7 Article

Phosphorus affects growth and partitioning of nitrogen to Rubisco in Pinus pinaster

Journal

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 11-19

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/22.1.11

Keywords

fertilizer; nitrogen allocation; nitrogen storage; N : P ratio; orthophosphate; photosynthesis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We tested the hypothesis that photosynthetic and growth responses to phosphorus (P) are functions of differences in the partitioning of nitrogen (N) among different compounds, particularly ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco). We tested this hypothesis in: (a) a greenhouse experiment with mycorrhizal seedlings of Pinus pinaster Ait. grown in sand culture for 4 months with six factorial combinations of N (0.125 and 2.0 mM) and P (0.02, 0.08 and 0.34 mM); and (b) a field study in which P was applied at five rates (up to 175 kg ha(-1)) to 2-year-old P. pinaster growing on P-deficient siliceous sand. After 4 months of nutrient addition or 2 years after fertilizer application, we measured light-saturated rates of photosynthesis, growth, and N and P allocation in needles. Growth of P. pinaster increased significantly with increasing concentrations of P, as did the concentration of P in needles. Concentrations of P and Rubisco were positively related, whereas those of N and Rubisco were unrelated. At low-P supply, the Rubisco/Chl ratio varied between 8.5 and 12 mmol mol(-1). With P supply in excess of requirement (needle N:P ratio = 2-12) the Rubisco/Chl ratio increased to between 24 and 26 mmol mol(-1). Rates of light-saturated photosynthesis were unaffected by P supply because adequate concentrations of P were maintained in plants in all treatments. Orthophosphate accumulated in needles of plants receiving a high P supply, which may allow growth to continue for periods under P deficiency, provided that other nutrients also accumulate. In the case of N, Rubisco may fill this role.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available