4.2 Article

Developing Defined and Scalable 3D Culture Systems for Culturing Human Pluripotent Stem Cells at High Densities

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 172-183

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12195-014-0333-z

Keywords

Human embryonic stem cells; Induced pluripotent stem cells; 3D culture system; Thermoreversible hydrogel

Funding

  1. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine [RT2-02022]
  2. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [T1-00007]
  3. NIH [1R01ES020 903-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs)-including embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs)-are very promising candidates for cell therapies, tissue engineering, high throughput pharmacology screens, and toxicity testing. These applications require large numbers of high quality cells; however, scalable production of human pluripotent stem cells and their derivatives at a high density and under well-defined conditions has been a challenge. We recently reported a simple, efficient, fully defined, scalable, and good manufacturing practice (GMP) compatible 3D culture system based on a thermoreversible hydrogel for hPSC expansion and differentiation. Here, we describe additional design rationale and characterization of this system. For instance, we have determined that culturing hPSCs as a suspension in a liquid medium can exhibit lower volumetric yields due to cell agglomeration and possible shear force-induced cell loss. By contrast, using hydrogels as 3D scaffolds for culturing hPSCs reduces aggregation and may insulate from shear forces. Additionally, hydrogel-based 3D culture systems can support efficient hPSC expansion and differentiation at a high density if compatible with hPSC biology. Finally, there are considerable opportunities for future development to further enhance hydrogel-based 3D culture systems for producing hPSCs and their progeny.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available