Journal
AMERICAN NATURALIST
Volume 162, Issue 5, Pages 638-652Publisher
UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/378823
Keywords
inbreeding depression; local competition; mate choice; mating systems; sexual selection
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Inbreeding avoidance is predicted to induce sex biases in dispersal. But which sex should disperse? In polygynous species, females pay higher costs to inbreeding and thus might be expected to disperse more, but empirical evidence consistently reveals male biases. Here, we show that theoretical expectations change drastically if females are allowed to avoid inbreeding via kin recognition. At high inbreeding loads, females should prefer immigrants over residents, thereby boosting male dispersal. At lower inbreeding loads, by contrast, inclusive fitness benefits should induce females to prefer relatives, thereby promoting male philopatry. This result points to disruptive effects of sexual selection. The inbreeding load that females are ready to accept is surprisingly high. In absence of search costs, females should prefer related partners as long as delta
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available
© Peeref 2019-2024. All rights reserved.