4.6 Article

Sleeping characteristics of adults undergoing outpatient elective surgery: A cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA
Volume 15, Issue 7, Pages 505-509

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.02.002

Keywords

sleep; outpatient; adult; surgery; actigraphy; anxiety

Categories

Funding

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD037007] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [R01HD37007-01] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objective: To describe sleeping patterns of adults before and after outpatient surgery. Design: Observational cohort study. Setting: Outpatient surgical facility. Patients: 127 consenting adults, including 92 surgery patients and 35 community controls. Interventions: Participants' sleep was measured for two days before and 2 days after outpatient surgery. Measurements: Sleep was measured using actigraphy; additional measurements were made of anxiety (STAI), pain and energy (VAS), recovery (PHRI), and sleep history. Main Results: Approximately 23% of patients experienced clinically significant sleep impairment after surgery, a more difficult recovery, increased pain, and lower energy. In contrast, only 2.9% of the community control g-roup experienced clinically significant sleep impairment during the same time period. Also, patients in the surgery group experienced significantly more True Wake Time postoperatively than did control patients (p = 0.029). The surgery group also experienced more Night Awakenings >5 minutes than the control group (p = 0.006), but not more overall Night Awakenings (p = 0,1106). Finally, of the patients in the surgery group, those who had higher state anxiety in the holding area also had more difficulty sleeping over the 4-day monitoring period (True Sleep Time was lower, 352 +/- 187 vs. 229 +/- 225, p = 0.009). Conclusions: A moderate proportion of adults experience Postoperative sleeping problems. (C) 2003 by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available