4.2 Article

The Use of Immunofluorescent Array Tomography to Study the Three-Dimensional Microstructure of Murine Blood Vessels

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOENGINEERING
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 311-323

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12195-011-0165-z

Keywords

Immunofluorescence microscopy; Three-dimensional microstructure; Murine blood vessels; Infrarenal aorta; Elastin; Collagen type I; Smooth muscle cells; Volume fraction; Cellular morphology

Funding

  1. Amgen Inc.
  2. NIH [1P50HL083800]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to develop the methods needed to enable the application of Immunofluorescent Array Tomography (IAT), a novel three-dimensional (3D) microscopy technique, to murine blood vessels. The anterior and posterior regions of the infrarenal aorta of 8-10 week old C57BL6 mice were evaluated. Staining and image analysis methods were developed. Antibody selection, primary antibody concentration, co-staining with multiple primary antibodies, and the multi-cycle staining design were optimized to produce positive and specific staining of elastin (1:50 dilution), smooth muscle cell actin (SMCA, 20 mu g mL(-1)), and collagen type I (10 mu g mL(-1)). Non-specific interactions were limited by optimizing secondary antibody staining conditions (1:200 dilution, 30 min). SMCA and collagen type I were stained in the first cycle, elastin was stained in the second cycle, and nuclei were stained in both cycles. Algorithms were developed to quantify volume fractions of medial elastin, SMCA, and nuclei, as well as adventitial collagen type I. Elastin thickness, spacing between elastin lamellae, elastin fragmentation, media wall thickness, nuclei aspect ratio, and nuclei amount were also quantified. We have qualitatively and quantitatively characterized the 3D microstructure and cellular morphology of the anterior and posterior infrarenal murine aorta using IAT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available