4.4 Article

Nanostructural features of demosponge biosilica

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY
Volume 144, Issue 3, Pages 271-281

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.09.031

Keywords

porifera; Tethya aurantia; spicules; silicatein; silicon; biomineralization; biomimetic

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent interest in the optical and mechanical properties of silica structures made by living sponges, and the possibility of harnessing these mechanisms for the synthesis of advanced materials and devices, motivate our investigation of the nanoscale structure of these remarkable biomaterials. Scanning electron and atomic force microscopic (SEM and AFM) analyses of the annular substructure of demosponge biosilica spicules reveals that the deposited material is nanoparticulate, with a mean particle diameter of 74 +/- 13 nm. The nanoparticles are deposited in alternating layers with characteristic etchant reactivities. Further analyses of longitudinally fractured spicules indicate that each deposited layer is approximately monoparticulate in thickness and exhibits extensive long range ordering, revealing an unanticipated level of nanoscale structural complexity. NMR data obtained from differentially heated spicule samples suggest that the etch sensitivity exhibited by these annular domains may be related to variation in the degree of silica condensation, rather than variability in the inclusion of organics. In addition, AFM phase imaging in conjunction with results obtained from HE and alkaline etching experiments suggest that at various stages in spicule biosynthesis, regions of unusually low silica condensation are deposited, indicating a possible interruption in normal spicule formation. While this discovery of nanoparticulate silica aggregation in demosponge skeletal elements is likely to reflect the intrinsic kinetic tendency of silica to form such particles during polycondensation, the heirarchical organization of these nanoparticles is biologically unique. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available