4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Estimating the dynamics of groundwater input into the coastal zone via continuous radon-222 measurements

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY
Volume 69, Issue 1-2, Pages 21-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0265-931X(03)00084-5

Keywords

groundwater; coastal zone; radon; radium; tracers; mixing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) into the coastal zone has received increased attention in the last few years as it is now recognized that this process represents an important pathway for material transport. Assessing these material fluxes is difficult, as there is no simple means to gauge the water flux. To meet this challenge, we have explored the use of a continuous radon monitor to measure radon concentrations in coastal zone waters over time periods from hours to days. Changes in the radon inventories over time can be converted to fluxes after one makes allowances for tidal effects, losses to the atmosphere, and mixing with offshore waters. If one assumes that advective flow of radon-enriched groundwater (pore waters) represent the main input of Rn-222 in the coastal zone, the calculated radon fluxes may be converted to water fluxes by dividing by the estimated or measured Rn-222 pore water activity. We have also used short-lived radium isotopes (Ra-223 and Ra-224) to assess mixing between near-shore and offshore waters in the manner pioneered by Moore (2000). During an experiment in the coastal Gulf of Mexico, we showed that the mixing loss derived from the Ra-223 gradient agreed very favorably to the estimated range based on the calculated radon fluxes. This allowed an independent constraint on the mixing loss of radon-an important parameter in the mass balance approach. Groundwater discharge was also estimated independently by the radium isotopic approach and was within a factor of two of that determined by the continuous radon measurements and an automated seepage meter deployed at the same site. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available