4.7 Article

Turbulent Rayleigh-Benard convection in spherical shells

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 778, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2015.401

Keywords

Benard convection; boundary layers; geophysical and geological flows

Funding

  1. German Science Foundation [1488]
  2. Division Of Mathematical Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1440415] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We simulate numerically Boussinesq convection in non-rotating spherical shells for a fluid with a Prandtl number of unity and for Rayleigh numbers up to 10(9). In this geometry, curvature and radial variations of the gravitational acceleration yield asymmetric boundary layers. A systematic parameter study for various radius ratios (from eta = r(i)/r(o) = 0.2 to eta = 0.95) and gravity profiles allows us to explore the dependence of the asymmetry on these parameters. We find that the average plume spacing is comparable between the spherical inner and outer bounding surfaces. An estimate of the average plume separation allows us to accurately predict the boundary layer asymmetry for the various spherical shell configurations explored here. The mean temperature and horizontal velocity profiles are in good agreement with classical Prandtl-Blasius laminar boundary layer profiles, provided the boundary layers are analysed in a dynamical frame that fluctuates with the local and instantaneous boundary layer thicknesses. The scaling properties of the Nusselt and Reynolds numbers are investigated by separating the bulk and boundary layer contributions to the thermal and viscous dissipation rates using numerical models with eta = 0.6 and with gravity proportional to 1/r(2). We show that our spherical models are consistent with the predictions of Grossmann & Lohse's (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 407, 2000, pp. 27-56) theory and that Nu(Ra) and Re(Ra) scalings are in good agreement with plane layer results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available