3.9 Article

Oriented graphite single-crystal inclusions in diamond

Journal

ZEITSCHRIFT FUR KRISTALLOGRAPHIE
Volume 218, Issue 11, Pages 733-739

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1524/zkri.218.11.733.20302

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A crystallographic study of 13 specimens of diamonds with euhedral single-crystalline graphite inclusions in their centres is presented. All inclusions belong to the hexagonal graphite modification (space group P6(3)/mmC; a(0) approximate to 2.46 Angstrom, c(0) approximate to 6.70 Angstrom) and are up to 300 mum in diameter. Comparison of the measured c-lattice parameters of the graphite crystals with lattice parameters of graphite at elevated isostatic pressures indicates remnant pressures of up to 2.6 GPa acting on the inclusions. All samples exhibit distinct orientation relations between graphite and diamond. In 12 samples the direction [001] of graphite (G[001]) approximately parallels one of the directions <111> of cubic diamond (D<111>). The largest deviation is about 4degrees. A further division of these 12 samples is: (a) The three G(100) directions have angles of about 4 with three D<110> directions. This orientation relation is observed in five samples. (b) The angle between the same directions is about 34degrees in six samples. (c) In one sample this angle is about 16degrees. In a 13th specimen G[001] approximately parallels one of the three D<100>. The deviation is of about 6, and one of the G<100> directions nearly parallels one of the D<110>. These orientation relations are analysed with a simplified application of the coincidence site lattice (CSL) concept. A 14th specimen is different to all others, as it exhibits a large (about 300 mum edge length) region with a sharp hexagonal borderline filled with a patchwork of tiny graphite islands. Several parallel lamellae of up to 5 mum thickness result in a hexagonal pyramidal form. This graphite inclusion is suggested to be protogenetic with respect to the diamond.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available