4.4 Article

In vitro studies on the lymphoma growth-inhibitory activity of sulfasalazine

Journal

ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 21-29

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00001813-200301000-00004

Keywords

anticancer drug; dendritic cell; lymphoma; macrophage; mechanism of action; sulfasalazine; x(c)(-) cystine/glutamate antiporter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sulfasalazine (SASP) is a novel, potent inhibitor of cellular cystine uptake mediated by the x(c)(-) cystine/glutamate antiporter. Lymphoid cells cannot synthesize cyst(e)ine and depend for growth on its uptake from their micro-environment. We previously showed that SASP (0.2 mM) can abrogate lymphoma cell proliferation in vitro by specifically inhibiting x(c)(-)-mediated cystine uptake. Intraperitoneal administration of SASP to Noble rats markedly suppressed Nb2-U17 rat lymphoma transplant growth, notably without major toxicity to the hosts. Since Nb2-U17 cells are x(c)(-)-deficient, the growth arrest was apparently not due to SASP-tumor cell interaction, but possibly to interference with x(c)(-)-mediated cysteine secretion by somatic cells. In this study we found that replication of x(c)(-)-deficient Nb2-11 lymphoma cells can be sustained in vitro, in the absence of cystine uptake enhancers, by co-culturing with IMR-90 fibroblasts known to secrete cysteine. SASP, at 0.15 and 0.2 mM, arrested replication of fibroblast-driven Nb2-11 cells by 93 and 100%, respectively, without impeding fibroblast proliferation. Addition of 2-mercaptoethanol (60 muM), a cystine uptake enhancer, almost completely prevented this growth arrest, indicating that SASP specifically inhibited cysteine secretion by the fibroblasts, a process based on xc--mediated cystine uptake. It is proposed that the lymphoma growth-inhibitory activity of SASP in vivo involves inhibition of cysteine secretion by tumor-associated somatic cells (macrophages, dendritic cells), leading to cysteine starvation of the tumor cells and apoptosis. The difference between the lymphoma cells and fibroblasts in sensitivity to SASP treatment is consistent with the marked antitumor effect of SASP lacking significant side effects. Anti-Cancer Drugs 14:21-29 (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available