4.7 Article

Physical and pozzolanic action of mineral additions on the mechanical strength of high-performance concrete

Journal

CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 69-76

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00057-9

Keywords

mechanical strength; high-performance concrete; mineral additions; fly ash; rice husk ash; limestone filler; calcium hydroxide; combined water; pozzolanic effect; filler effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pozzolans play an important role when added to Portland cement because they usually increase the mechanical strength and durability of concrete structures. The most important effects in the cementitious paste microstructure are changes in pore structure produced by the reduction in the grain size caused by the pozzolanic reactions pozzolanic effect (PE) and the obstruction of pores and voids by the action of the finer grains (physical or filler effect). Few published investigations quantify these two effects. Twelve concrete mixtures were tested in this study: one with Portland cement (control), nine mixtures with 12.5%, 25% and 50% of replacement of cement by fly ash, rice husk ash and limestone filler; two with (12.5 + 12.5)% and (25 + 25)% of fly ash and rice husk ash. All the mixtures were prepared with water/binder ratios of 0.35, 0.50, and 0.65. The compressive strength for the samples was calculated in MPa per kg of cement. The remaining contents of calcium hydroxide and combined water were also tested. The results show that the pozzolanic and physical effects have increased as the mineral addition increased in the mixture, being higher after 91 days than after 28 days. When the results for the same strength values are compared (35 and 65 MPa), it was observed that the filler effect (FE) increased more than the pozzolanic effect. The PE was stronger in the binary and ternary mixtures prepared with rice husk ash in proportions of 25% or higher. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available