4.4 Article

In situ growth of the novel SM1 euryarchaeon from a string-of-pearls-like microbial community in its cold biotope, its physical separation and insights into its structure and physiology

Journal

ARCHIVES OF MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 180, Issue 3, Pages 211-217

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-003-0580-1

Keywords

Archaea; microbial community; sulfurous spring; string-of-pearls; SM1 euryarchaeon; psychrophilic; genome; immuno-FISH

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, a unique archaeal/bacterial community that grows in a macroscopically visible string-of-pearls-like structure in cold (similar to10degreesC), sulfurous marsh water was discovered. Here, a new technique is described that allows the fast and reliable growth of these string-of-pearls-like microbial communities in larger quantities on polyethylene nets in nature. The microbial net population, estimated to consist of about 10,000 single pearls, can be harvested once a week and the archaeal cells selectively separated by density gradient centrifugation. As in native pearls, the archaeal cell fraction obtained consisted of a single type of coccoid cells only, 0.6 mum in diameter. This novel type of euryarchaea has been tentatively named SM1 euryarchaeon. Electron microscopy and immuno-fluorescence in situ hybridization (immuno-FISH) revealed that about 100 pili-like fibers, up to 3 mum in length, emanate radially from the surface of each cell. The SM1 euryarchaeal cells exhibited a viability of about 90%. The optimal conditions for viability were temperatures between -2degreesC and 20degreesC, pH 5-9, and low salt conditions; cell viability was independent of oxygen partial pressures. The cultures stained gram-positive, the cell wall was sensitive to SDS, EDTA and Proteinase K treatment. The cells did not exhibit the typical fluorescence for methanogens and did not contain coenzyme F-420. The G+C-content was 34.5 mol%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available