4.5 Article

Noninvasive In Vivo Tracking of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Evaluation of Cell Therapeutic Effects in a Murine Model Using a Clinical 3.0 T MRI

Journal

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages 1971-1980

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3727/096368912X657747

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs); Cell tracking; Cardiac function; Myocardial infarction

Funding

  1. Else Kroner-Fresenius Foundation [P78/08, A93/08]
  2. Elisabeth and Rudolf Hirsch Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiac cell therapy with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) represents a promising treatment approach for end-stage heart failure. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms and the fate of the transplanted cells. The objective of the presented work is to determine the feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and in vivo monitoring after transplantation into infarcted mouse hearts using a clinical 3.0 T MRI device. The labeling procedure of bone marrow-derived MSCs with micron-sized paramagnetic iron oxide particles (MPIOs) did not affect the viability of the cells and their cell type-defining properties when compared to unlabeled cells. Using a clinical 3.0 T MRI scanner equipped with a dedicated small animal solenoid coil, 10(5) labeled MSCs could be detected and localized in the mouse hearts for up to 4 weeks after intramyocardial transplantation. Weekly ECG-gated scans using T1-weighted sequences were performed, and left ventricular function was assessed. Histological analysis of hearts confirmed the survival of labeled MSCs in the target area up to 4 weeks after transplantation. In conclusion, in vivo tracking of labeled MSCs using a clinical 3.0 T MRI scanner is feasible. In combination with assessment of heart function, this technology allows the monitoring of the therapeutic efficacy of regenerative therapies in a small animal model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available