4.5 Article

Early Islet Damage After Direct Exposure of Pig Islets to Blood: Has Humoral Immunity Been Underestimated?

Journal

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 21, Issue 8, Pages 1791-1802

Publisher

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096368912X653011

Keywords

Antibodies; Complement activation; Humoral immunity; IBMIR; Islet xenotransplantation

Funding

  1. Department of Defense [W81XWH-06-1-0317]
  2. JDRF [6-2005-1180]
  3. Revivicor, Inc.
  4. University of Pittsburgh

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, islet transplantation as a cell therapeutic option for type 1 diabetes occurs via islet injection into the portal vein. Direct contact between islets and blood is a pathophysiological provocation that results in the instant blood-mediated inflammatory reaction (IBMIR) and is associated with early islet loss. However, the nature of the various insults on the islets in the blood stream remains mostly unknown. To gain insight into the mechanisms, we utilized a simplified in vitro model in which islets were exposed to blood in different clinically relevant but increasingly challenging, autologous, allogeneic, and xenogeneic combinations. Irrespective of the blood type and species compatibility, islets triggered blood clotting. Islet damage was worse as islet, and blood compatibility diminished, with substantial islet injury after exposure of porcine islets to human blood. Islet damage involved membrane leakage, antibody deposition, complement activation, positive staining for the membrane attack complex, and mitochondria] dysfunction. Islet damage occurred even after exposure to plasma only, and specific complement inactivation and neutralization of IgM substantially prevented islet damage, indicating the importance of humoral immunity. Efficacious measures are needed to reduce this injury, especially in view of a potential clinical use of porcine islets to treat diabetes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available