4.5 Article

Cotransplantation of Mouse Neural Stem Cells (mNSCs) With Adipose Tissue-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improves mNSC Survival in a Rat Spinal Cord Injury Model

Journal

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 837-849

Publisher

COGNIZANT COMMUNICATION CORP
DOI: 10.3727/096368910X539083

Keywords

Mouse neural stem cells (mNSCs); Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs); Spinal cord injury

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea [SC-4180]
  2. KRIBB Research Initiative Program [KGM2210911]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The low survival rate of graft stem cells after transplantation into recipient tissue is a major obstacle for successful stem cell therapy. After transplantation into the site of spinal cord injury, the stem cells face not only hypoxia due to low oxygen conditions, but also a lack of nutrients caused by damaged tissues and poor vascular supply. To improve the survival of therapeutic stem cells after grafting into the injured spinal cord, we examined the effects of cotransplanting mouse neural stem cells (mNSCs) and adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) on mNSC viability. The viability of mNSCs in coculture with AT-MSCs was significantly increased compared to mNSCs alone in an in vitro injury model using serum deprivation (SD), hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), and combined (SD + H(2)O(2)) injury mimicking the ischemic environment of the injured spinal cord. We demonstrated that AT-MSCs inhibited the apoptosis of mNSCs in SD, H(2)O(2), and combined injury models. Consistent with these in vitro results, mNSCs transplanted into rat spinal cords with AT-MSCs showed better survival rates than mNSCs transplanted alone. These findings suggest that cotransplantation of mNSCs with AT-MSCs may be a more effective transplantation protocol to improve the survival of cells transplanted into the injured spinal cord.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available