4.5 Article

Reestablishment of microenvironment is necessary to maintain in vitro and in vivo human islet function

Journal

CELL TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 17, Issue 1-2, Pages 111-119

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.3727/000000008783907125

Keywords

pancreatic islets; self-assembling peptide nanofiber; extracellular matrix; human fibronectin; islet graft; transplantation; diabetes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Islet transplantation is associated with an elevated rate of early graft failure. The isolation process leads to structural and functional abnormalities. The reestablishment of the cell-matrix relationship is important to modulate the survival and function of islets. Thus, we evaluated the effect of human fibronectin (hFN) and self-assembling peptide nanofiber (SAPNF) in the ability to support islet function in vitro and after transplantation into streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice. Human isolated islets were cultured with hFN or SAPNF for 7 days. Their ability to maintain insulin production/ glucose responsiveness over time was evaluated. Islets embedded in hFN, SAPNF, or alone were transplanted into STZ-induced diabetic SCID mice. Islet grafts were removed after 14 days to evaluate insulin content, insulin expression, and apoptosis. SAPNF-entrapped islets maintained satisfactory morphology/viability and capability of glucose-dependent insulin secretion for over 7 days, whereas islets cultured in hFN underwent widespread deterioration. In vivo grafts containing human islets in SAPNF showed remarkably higher insulin content and expression when compared with human islets in hFn or alone. RT-PCR revealed lower caspase-3 expression in SAPNF islets grafts. These studies indicate that the reestablishment of the cell-matrix interactions by a synthetic matrix in the immediate postisolation period is a useful tool to maintain islet functions in vitro and in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available