4.6 Article

Impact of elaboration on socially desirable responding and the validity of biodata measures

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages 979-988

Publisher

AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.979

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current study investigated the impact of requiring respondents to elaborate on their answers to a biodata measure on mean scores, the validity of the biodata item composites, subgroup mean differences, and correlations with social desirability. Results of this study indicate that elaborated responses result in scores that are much lower than nonelaborated responses to the same items by an independent sample. Despite the lower mean score on elaborated items, it does not appear that elaboration affects the size of the correlation between social desirability and responses to biodata items or that it affects criterion-related validity or subgroup mean differences in a practically significant way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available