4.3 Article

Diabetes-induced atrophy is associated with a muscle-specific alteration in NF-κB activation and expression

Journal

CELL STRESS & CHAPERONES
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 287-296

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12192-008-0062-0

Keywords

diabetes mellitus; NF-kappa B; diabetes-induced atrophy; gastrocnemius

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

NF-kappa B is a transcription factor implicated in pathological responses that develop during diabetes mellitus, including skeletal muscle atrophy. Given that NF-kappa B activation, protein composition, and content within diabetic skeletal muscle remain generally uncharacterized, a streptozotocin (STZ) model was used to assess NF-kappa B activation, composition, and content. Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with STZ (55 mg/kg) and after 30 days the soleus (SOL), plantaris (PL), red gastrocnemius (RG), and white gastrocnemius (WG) muscles were assessed by electrophoresis mobility shift assay and western blotting. NF-kappa B activation was detected in all muscles examined, but was reduced in RG muscles from diabetic animals. Supershifts indicated NF-kappa B was composed primarily of p50 in diabetic and control animals. The content of both p65 and p52 was elevated in SOL and PL muscles, while p52 was decreased in RG. The coactivating protein, Bcl-3, was increased in WG and RG, but decreased in PL. Both p50 and RelB remained unchanged in all tissues examined. All muscles from diabetic animals demonstrated reduced mass when compared to controls, but only the gastrocnemius demonstrated atrophy as reflected by a reduced muscle-to-body mass ratio. In conclusion, diabetic alterations to the contents and activation of the NF-kappa B protein were tissue-specific, but did not appear to alter dimer composition of constitutively bound NF-kappa B. These results indicate that diabetes may alter NF-kappa B activity and expression in a muscle-specific manner.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available