4.7 Article

Active and Passive Demethylation of Male and Female Pronuclear DNA in the Mammalian Zygote

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages 447-458

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.08.003

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Sciences and Technology of China [2012CB966903, 2014CB964802, 2012CB966704, 2011CB966303]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [31230039, 31221001, 31322037, 31271543, 31225017, 91319310]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA01010301, XDQ01010403]
  4. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2014ZX09507-002]
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/J007773/1]
  6. MRC [MR/J007773/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/J007773/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The epigenomes of mammalian sperm and oocytes, characterized by gamete-specific 5-methylcytosine (5mC) patterns, are reprogrammed during early embryogenesis to establish full developmental potential. Previous studies have suggested that the paternal genome is actively demethylated in the zygote while the maternal genome undergoes subsequent passive demethylation via DNA replication during cleavage. Active demethylation is known to depend on 5mC oxidation by Tet dioxygenases and excision of oxidized bases by thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG). Here we show that both maternal and paternal genomes undergo widespread active and passive demethylation in zygotes before the first mitotic division. Passive demethylation was blocked by the replication inhibitor aphidicolin, and active demethylation was abrogated by deletion of Tet3 in both pronuclei. At actively demethylated loci, 5mCs were processed to unmodified cytosines. Surprisingly, the demethylation process was unaffected by the deletion of TDG from the zygote, suggesting the existence of other demethylation mechanisms downstream of Tet3-mediated oxidation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available