4.7 Article

Recurrent Variations in DNA Methylation in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells and Their Differentiated Derivatives

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 620-634

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.02.013

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH/NICHD
  2. Hartwell Foundation
  3. CIRM [CL100502, RT1-01108, TR1-01250, RN2-00931-1]
  4. NIH [R33MH87925]
  5. Millipore Foundation
  6. Esther O'Keefe Foundation
  7. Autism Speaks Dennis Weatherstone fellowship
  8. Marie Mayer Foundation
  9. Bill and Melinda Gates Grand Challenges Explorations Award
  10. Australian Stem Cell Centre
  11. Stem Cells Australia
  12. Victoria-California Stem Cell Alliance (CIRM) [TR101250]
  13. Stem Cell Research Center [SC2250]
  14. Ministry of Educational Science and Technology
  15. Else-Kroner Fresenius Stiftung fellowship
  16. Pew Charitable Trust
  17. UNCF/Merck

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are potential sources of cells for modeling disease and development, drug discovery, and regenerative medicine. However, it is important to identify factors that may impact the utility of hPSCs for these applications. In an unbiased analysis of 205 hPSC and 130 somatic samples, we identified hPSC-specific epigenetic and transcriptional aberrations in genes subject to X chromosome inactivation (XCI) and genomic imprinting, which were not corrected during directed differentiation. We also found that specific tissue types were distinguished by unique patterns of DNA hypomethylation, which were recapitulated by DNA demethylation during in vitro directed differentiation. Our results suggest that verification of baseline epigenetic status is critical for hPSC-based disease models in which the observed phenotype depends on proper XCI or imprinting and that tissue-specific DNA methylation patterns can be accurately modeled during directed differentiation of hPSCs, even in the presence of variations in XCI or imprinting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available