4.7 Article

Efficient hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on stromal cells derived from hematopoietic niches

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 85-98

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.06.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E012841/1] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Medical Research Council [G9826762, G9900837, G0301182] Funding Source: Medline
  3. BBSRC [BB/E012841/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. MRC [G0301182, G9826762, G9900837] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/E012841/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700711B, G0301182, G9826762, G9900837] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hematopoietic stem cells derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) could provide a therapeutic alternative to bone marrow transplants, but the efficiency of currently available derivation protocols is low. In this study, we investigated whether coculture with monolayers; of cells derived from mouse AGM and fetal liver, or with stromal cell lines derived from these tissues, can enhance hESC hematopoietic differentiation. We found that under such conditions hESC-derived differentiating cells formed early hematopoietic progenitors, with a peak at day 18-21 of differentiation that corresponded to the highest CD34 expression. These hESC-derived hematopoietic cells were capable of primary and secondary hematopoietic engraftment into immunocompromised mice at substantially higher levels than described previously. Transcriptional and functional analysis identified TGF-beta 1 and TGF-beta 3 as positive enhancers of hESC hematopoietic differentiation that can further stimulate this process when added to the culture. Overall, our findings represent significant progress toward the goal of deriving functional hematopoietic stem cells from hESCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available